As I sit at my computer now, writing this piece, I am trying to turn my thoughts toward speaking before members of the U.S. Congress this Thursday March 6 th . I was in Washington D.C. this same time last year for IWD 2007 with several of my colleagues, where we raised awareness of the dangers to young women undergoing egg harvesting and retrieval procedures. Then I returned this past November to continue speaking with our nation’s leaders about the serious issues facing women involved with reproductive technologies. Here we are again, gearing up for another IWD, and I am going back for yet another pass. This time around I am extending my hopes and going not only to educate members of Congress about these dangers, but with the call to enact policy changes that will encourage widespread positive effects on the entire egg donation scheme. And what a scheme it is! But things move slowly and change rarely seems to happen when and how we prefer. So I am adopting a healthy and hopeful realism – cautiously optimistic.
Since Louise Brown, the first test tube baby was born in 1978 (Note: Without hyperstimulation of her mother’s ovaries), the female body has been totally deconstructed. Wombs for rent, eggs for sale, artificial wombs, synthetic gametes, post-menopausal women having babies, and technology to literally transform sperm into eggs and eggs into sperm! Who is shaping this progress? Who does this progress effect? And if this is progress, what kind of progress is it? Where does it take humanity? How can we put the female body back together again? And reconnect our sexuality with procreation in order to retain human dignity and a proper purpose of our bodies. Deep questions which are hard to answer in a side bite world. But since baby steps move us slowly, and hopefully in the direction of a truly good for all of humanity, here are some of my suggestions I plan to offer this week.
- Invest in better understanding of fertility and infertility and how to treat it
- Practice minimal stimulation ﾖ natural cycle IVF
- No surplus embryos
- Single embryo implantation
- Stop sex selection and eugenic pre-genetic screening practices
- Deemphasize money ﾖ it negatively drives the agenda
- Encourage traditional adoption and foster parenting
Here’s to “shaping progress” ﾖ that is, for a wholly human future!
Tell us what you think. In what ways do reproductive technologies “deconstuct” women? Send us your comments.
Lahl comments on a recent article in Time, Wanted: Someone to Play God, in her blog, TheHumanFuture. A few excerpts are included here:
Nancy Gibbs over at Time Magazine has a good piece out on IVF. She says a lot of the things I’ve been saying and writing about for years. Like:
Gibbs – “Princeton’s Robert George and University of South Carolina’s Christopher Tollefsen’s recommendation is “Don’t create more embryos than you will implant. No freezing, no choosing, no storing for future use and no experimenting on them.””
Lahl – I’ve written on the great policies in Germany and the movement toward eSET (elective single embryo transfer) and the violation of the dignity of life when we choose to make designer babies.
Gibbs – “And what of the half a million leftover embryos, which now nestle in nitrogen? Are they people–or property?”
Lahl – The Chinatown syndrome and the fate of the human frozen embryo .
- Sperm Donation2022.03.15Venus Rising with Edward Saulig: Reflections of a Sperm Donor
- Bioethics2022.03.13Dr. C. Ben Mitchell: 2022 Ramsey Award Winner
- #BigFertility2022.03.10Documentary Explores One Woman’s Journey through Egg Donation
- Bioethics2022.03.09Questioning the “Science” of the Gender Industry