amendment 2 passes next month. Missouri is currently in a battle similar to that which California faced back in 2004 as Proposition 71 successfully strapped the golden state with $3 billion dollars in bond debt. As I write this article, I am preparing to travel to Missouri this week and weave my way across the state speaking out on human cloning research.
The Missouri campaign against human cloning mirrors many of the strategies which were attempted out west. First, opponents from both states called it what it is–Human Cloning. Both states are up against big money and supporters of the legislation who want voters to believe this is a debate over leftover, spare embryos which are just going to be thrown away. Wrong. The researchers themselves will tell you, often quite candidly, that they want fresh eggs, from young women–and lots of them to make disease specific clonal embryos for their specific research. Second, the hype for cures just around the corner for every major disease is rampant in these debates. The television ads are running in Missouri, pulling on the heart strings of voters and preying on the fears of those who are sick and desperate for real cures. Embryo stem research is put on the pedestal of the cure all for everything–the Holy Grail of stem cells. Once again, candid honesty tells us that cures–if at all–are years away. And finally, both states have opponents of their legislation who seek to form common cause with groups and individuals outside of the traditional conservative pro life fray. For example, the Farm Bureau in Missouri just came out against amendment 2. There is much to be leery about with this type of legislation. Feminists are outraged by big biotech’s raping of the female body. Environmentalists are concerned about harnessing human engineering and unleashing harmful technologies into an unsuspecting earth. Social justice concerns are prevalent as worries about producing expensive therapies that only the rich will enjoy, but will be developed on the backs of the poor. And always, if you follow the money, many people get a queasy feeling. People wonder about the ethics of squandering millions and billions of dollars on speculative research while millions of Americans don’t even have basic health care coverage.
There is one thing those working the Missouri campaign have that California didn’t have. Missourians against human cloning have California in their rear view mirror. Voters, and specifically taxpayers in Missouri can look at the test case out west and learn from the Golden state before they pour their precious resources down a big black hole. In California we were told just last week that cures are 10 years away.
James Sherley, an associate professor of biological engineering at MIT said, “In the end, when the public says no to the use of human embryos for research, stem cell research in America will not die. It will just get better from increased research effort on adult stem cells and new approaches to convert adult stem cells, but without the use of human embryos. And when there is good science, good funding and good investment will soon follow, as always.”
- Sperm Donation2022.03.15Venus Rising with Edward Saulig: Reflections of a Sperm Donor
- Bioethics2022.03.13Dr. C. Ben Mitchell: 2022 Ramsey Award Winner
- #BigFertility2022.03.10Documentary Explores One Woman’s Journey through Egg Donation
- Bioethics2022.03.09Questioning the “Science” of the Gender Industry