Dear Friends and Co-Supporters of Stop Surrogacy Now,
Greetings from sunny Australia. Unfortunately, the Australian Government has given us an early Christmas present by calling a long-awaited Parliamentary Inquiry into Surrogacy just before the time when Australians usually embark on our well-deserved summer break. Alas, many of us will now be writing submissions.
Submissions to this Inquiry are due on 11 February 2016, preceded by an earlier email in which you must declare your intention to send a Submission by 1 February 2016. Submissions need to be sent to firstname.lastname@example.org or can be lodged via the Committee website.
WE NEED YOUR HELP!
The Inquiry is very keen to receive submissions from residents from other countries, as well as Australians, so we urge you to write in and share experiences about surrogacy as it is practiced – or not – in your countries.
It will be especially valuable for submissions to be received from people in countries where surrogacy is entirely prohibited (e.g., France, Germany, Switzerland), from those where only ’altruistic surrogacy’ is allowed, and from those where altruistic and commercial surrogacy arrangements are permitted (e.g., the USA, Mexico).
At the end of this letter are the Terms of Reference. This Inquiry follows on from a Round Table on Surrogacy held in March 2015, at which we both were invited guests (as representatives of VANISH, an organization for adopted and donor conceived people, and FINRRAGE, a long-term feminist network resisting all forms of surrogacy). Also invited were representatives from pro-surrogacy groups and the IVF industry, as well as government representatives from the State of Victoria, where altruistic surrogacy is permitted but heavily regulated. Further Round Table speakers included representatives from Relinquishing Mothers (ARMS) and Donor Conceived people and a number of academics, judges, surrogacy lawyers, infertility counselors, and psychologists. The proceedings were recorded in Hansard and can be accessed via the Parliament of Australia website.
The Round Table was a sobering experience. Those of us from VANISH, FINRRAGE, ARMS, and Donor Conceived groups who oppose surrogacy were drowned out by pro-surrogacy voices.
Put differently, it will be very difficult to convince the representatives of this Parliamentary Standing Committee that surrogacy (in all its forms) should be stopped now, as they will be snowed under with submissions from the pro-surrogacy lobby, including gay rights’ groups (the fight for marriage equality in Australia is ongoing and strong).
Here is a very brief summary of the current situation regarding surrogacy in Australia:
- Surrogacy is regulated by individual states and territories (as is, for example, prostitution). This might be challenged by pro-surrogacy submissions but it is likely to remain in place.
- Commercial surrogacy is prohibited in all six states (Victoria-Vic, New South Wales-NSW, Queensland-Qld, Western Australia-WA, South Australia-SA, and Tasmania-Tas) and one territory (Australian Capital Territory-ACT). The other territory, Northern Territory-NT, currently has no laws on surrogacy.
- Altruistic surrogacy is permitted in all states and territories. Because surrogacy is regulated by the states/territories, there are no uniform laws. Victoria has the strongest regulation of altruistic surrogacy but, unfortunately, the state authority overseeing surrogacy, VARTA, is strongly pro-surrogacy. The application process is expensive, favouring wealthy people.
- With regard to overseas surrogacy, NSW, QLD, and the ACT make it a criminal act for citizens to engage in this practice, in no matter which country. Unfortunately, though, breaking this law has never been enforced. Residents from these states engage in surrogacy in whatever country they like (many go to the US), then when the baby is born, they visit the Australian embassy/consulate and, as long as a DNA test proves paternity, the baby is issued with travel documents, including an Australian passport. No sanctions await at home!
The worst outcome of this Inquiry would be if the Committee (and later the Parliament of Australia, which will vote on its recommendations) proposes to introduce legalized commercial surrogacy in all states and territories. This is what pro-surrogacy groups are advocating. They argue that exploitative practices in poor countries, as well as countries making surrogacy for foreigners illegal (e.g., India, Thailand, Nepal, Cambodia), necessitate the introduction of ‘safe’ and ‘well regulated’ commercial surrogacy in Australia: a typical neo-liberal harms-minimization response. (As the booming Australian prostitution industry shows, this does not work; for every legal brothel there are three illegal enterprises, and the harm, exploitation, and serious damage to prostituted people continues unabated.) It is quite possible that the introduction of commercial surrogacy will be the outcome.
The best outcome of this Inquiry would be if a) all States and Territories made it a criminal offence to engage in overseas surrogacy and reinforced punishment should this law be broken, and b) if all altruistic surrogacies were prohibited, too, with the argument that a desire for a child does not equal a right to a child when other parties (e.g. the ‘surrogate’ mother and the egg ‘donor’) are invariably exploited and harmed. Furthermore, the child born of a surrogacy arrangement is commodified and taken away from his or her birth mother without consent from the child. Unfortunately, a) is unlikely to be recommended (though remains a possibility), and b) are even less likely to be the outcome, mainly because altruistic surrogacy in Victoria is hailed as being so well regulated.
Payment for egg ‘donations’ will also be considered by the Inquiry. It is currently illegal to pay egg providers more than ‘compensation’ but the NH&MRC (National Health and Medical Research Council) has been heavily lobbied over the last few years to allow payments for eggs.
Standing in the way of these unhappy outcomes are the following FACTS:
- In 1990, Australia ratified the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989). Article 7 of the Convention affords children the right, as far as possible, to know and be cared for by their parents; Article 8 asserts children’s right for preservation of their identity, including nationality, name and family relations; and Article 9 provides the right for children separated from one or both parents to maintain personal relations and direct contact with their parent(s). Clearly, surrogacy – whether ‘altruistic’ or ‘commercial’ – inherently violates one or more of these rights.
- In March 2013, a bi-partisan National Apology for unethical (known as ‘forced’) adoption policies and practices prior to the 1980s was made by then Prime Minister Julia Gillard. In her widely acclaimed speech, Ms Gillard stated:
We resolve, as a nation, to do all in our power to make sure these practices are never repeated. In facing future challenges, we will remember the lessons of family separation. Our focus will be on protecting the fundamental rights of children and on the importance of the child’s right to know and be cared for by his or her parents.
- Furthermore, as documentaries such as Eggsploitation and Breeders? show clearly, the harm to egg providers and birth mothers is so substantial that these practices violate human rights to health and dignity, and should therefore never been allowed. Australia has signed the Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW); surrogacy contravenes this Convention.
We urge you all to make a submission – whether detailed or brief – to the current Australian Inquiry into Surrogacy. Such submissions will be crucial to any chance of preventing repetition of widespread state-sanctioned practices that deliberately, insensitively, and cruelly separate children from their biological and genetic parents in Australia, and profoundly violate women’s universal human rights. (Information and instructions below.)
Dr. Renate Klein, FINRRAGE
Penny Mackieson, VANISH
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STANDING COMMITTEE ON SOCIAL POLICY AND LEGAL AFFAIRS
Inquiry into surrogacy
The Attorney-General, Senator the Hon George Brandis QC, has asked the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Social Policy and Legal Affairs to conduct an inquiry into surrogacy arrangements for Australians.
The Committee invites you to make a submission which provides your views on any or all of the terms of reference. While the secretariat makes every effort to contact all interested parties, it would be appreciated if you could pass this information on to anyone you think might be interested in making a submission.
The Committee would appreciate your contribution to the inquiry to be received by Thursday 11 February 2016. Please contact the Committee secretariat by 1 February 2016 if you intend to make a submission.
Further information on the inquiry, including the full terms of reference, can be found on the committee website at www.aph.gov.au/spla.
Terms of Reference
The House of Representatives Standing Committee on Social Policy and Legal Affairs will inquire and report into the regulatory and legislative aspects of international and domestic surrogacy arrangements, with a focus on:
- the role and responsibility of states and territories to regulate surrogacy, both international and domestic, and differences in existing legislative arrangements
- medical and welfare aspects for all parties involved, including regulatory requirements for intending parents and the role of health care providers, welfare services and other service providers
- issues arising regarding informed consent, exploitation, compensatory payments, rights and protections for all parties involved, including children
- relevant Commonwealth laws, policies and practices (including family law, immigration, citizenship, passports, child support and privacy) and improvements that could be made to enable the Commonwealth to respond appropriately to this issue (including consistency between laws where appropriate and desirable) to better protect children and others affected by such arrangements
- Australia’s international obligations
- the adequacy of the information currently available to interested parties to surrogacy arrangements (including the child) on risks, rights and protections
- information sharing between the Commonwealth and states and territories, and
- the laws, policies and practices of other countries that impact upon international surrogacy, particularly those relating to immigration and citizenship.
Submissions can be emailed to email@example.com or lodged via the Committee website.
Please note that submissions should not include incriminating or personally identifying information. The Committee will exercise final judgement on whether a submission is suitable for publication.
For further information about the inquiry, please contact the Committee secretariat on (02) 6277 2358 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Sperm DonationMarch 15, 2022Venus Rising with Edward Saulig: Reflections of a Sperm Donor
- BioethicsMarch 13, 2022Dr. C. Ben Mitchell: 2022 Ramsey Award Winner
- #BigFertilityMarch 10, 2022Documentary Explores One Woman’s Journey through Egg Donation
- BioethicsMarch 9, 2022Questioning the “Science” of the Gender Industry